Law Articles
To search for a particular term please use the following search box.
Click on a Topic to see available articles for that topic.
- Accidents
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty Law
- Articles
- Banking
- Bankruptcy Law
- Canon Law
- Case Law
- Civil Law
- Civil Rights
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Commercial Law
- Common Law
- Comparative Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Courts
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Dispute Resolution
- Employment Law
- Equity
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Fiduciary Law
- General Practice
- Government
- Health Law
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Jurisprudence
- Labor Law
- Law and Economics
- Maritime Law
- Military Law
- Natural Law
- Personal Injury Law
- Philosophy of Law
- Property Law
- Public Law
- Real Estate Law
- Social Security
- Space Law
- Statutory Law
- Tax Law
- Traffic Law
- Trusts and Estates
- Water Law
Return to Law Dictionary Index
INDIA - New Patent Act - The Controversies
by P.M.George Kutty
India finally amended its Patents Act and Rules to become fully compliant with TRIPS on 26th Decemer 2004 by an Ordinance and followed by the Act being passed in January 2005. The black box applications filed under the WTO brand from 1/1/1995 were opened for processing. Even though the amendment opens all areas of technolgy in respect of product patents, some controversies have been created in the interpretation of the amendments. Product patent applications in the field of food and chemicals in general which have been filed before 1/1/2005 and are under process have been denied product protection and restricted to process patent only.The patent office view is that since the Act before amendment, by section 5(1)(b) was not allowing the product patent, the amendment can be effected for product patent in these fields only for applications filed after 1/1/2005. Of course in the case of black box applications in the filed of drugs product patents are being granted.
Another area of controversy doing the rounds is that of eighteen month publication. The order of publications is being questioned as pre grant opposition is based on these publications. If a later application is published first, then the earlier application if in the same field cannot be cited for novelty purpose. Another angle in which it is debated is because of the provision of provisional protection as later application if published first will get proviisonal protection earlier than the application which was actually filed first.
About the Author
Get a Registered Patent Attorney at www.pmgip.com